Security and Permissions
Last updated
Was this helpful?
This page explains how to think about access, scope, and governance for Hookshot™ in a company setting.
Use it when connecting apps, preparing for rollout, or reviewing risk with technical stakeholders.
A proposed workflow
At least one integration you plan to connect
Connect only the integrations you need and keep the boundary as narrow as practical.
Examples:
One team instead of every team
One repo instead of every repo
One channel instead of every channel
Ask two different questions:
What should be allowed to start this Protege?
What should the Protege be allowed to do?
Review both before launch. A healthy integration connection does not prove that the trigger path and action path are both correct.
Use team-scoped connections for shared production workflows. Use personal connections only when the Protege needs one person's account context.
For chat surfaces, confirm the team-level chat configuration and the exact channels, projects, or portfolios Hookshot should monitor.
Before rollout, confirm:
Which team owns the Protege
Who can change integrations
Who is responsible for Audit review when something goes wrong
The safer workflow is the one you can quickly inspect:
Event Feed shows the incoming signal
Audit shows the resulting action
Work Hub shows pending writes awaiting your approval
For company automations, good governance means narrow scope, clear ownership, and a reliable rollback path more than maximum complexity in the first version.
Connected integrations are limited to the intended workflow
Trigger Access and Tool Access match the business need
The owning team can inspect Event Feed and Audit
Admin-only workspace actions are limited to the people who should manage workspace settings and credentials
Overscoped integrations
Shared ownership with no clear reviewer
Treating a successful connection as a completed security review
Using a personal connection for a workflow that should belong to a team
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Was this helpful?